被动声学监测技术在鸟类多样性评估中的应用: 以浙江丽水亚热带鸟类群落为例

Application of Passive Acoustic Monitoring in Bird Diversity Assessment: A Case Study of Sub-tropical Bird Communities in Lishui, Zhejiang Province

  • 摘要: 传统鸟类调查受人力、时间等限制, 难以实现大范围、长时间的监测。被动声学监测(PAM)凭借非侵入性、可长期监测等优势, 为鸟类多样性评估提供了新途径。为探究PAM在亚热带森林鸟类多样性监测中的应用效果, 本研究于2020-2023年在浙江省丽水市7个区域针对鸟类开展传统样线调查与PAM监测, 结合人工与AI辅助识别处理音频数据, 获取鸟类物种组成及鸟类声学活动多样性指数〔物种数(R_SN)、多样性指数(R_H)、丰富度指数(R_R)、均匀度指数(R_J)、鸟类指数(R_V)〕, 并计算6种声景指数〔声学复杂度指数(ACI)、生物声学指数(BI)、声学熵指数(H)、归一化声景指数(NDSI)、声学多样性指数(ADI)、声学均匀度指数(AEI)〕。结果表明: (1)样线调查与被动声学监测两种方法共记录鸟类177种, 共同记录鸟类103种(占58.19%), 各有37种鸟类为单一方法所记录, 声学监测有效补充了传统调查的遗漏物种; (2)声景指数与鸟类声学活动多样性指数的相关性呈显著季节差异, 春季15对指数显著相关, 夏季3对指数显著相关, 其中生物声学指数(BI)在总体数据尺度上表现最稳健; (3)基于声学数据计算的鸟类物种数与声学鸟类指数在7个区域间的排序一致, 能有效区分不同生境的鸟类多样性水平。综上, PAM能有效获取鸟类物种组成信息, 鸟类声学活动多样性指数在多样性评估中具有潜力, 但声景指数的应用需考虑季节差异。本研究为亚热带地区应用PAM开展生物多样性监测与评估提供了科学依据与实践参考。

     

    Abstract: Traditional bird survey methods require a large number of experienced ornithology experts and the time and the space that can be covered are limited. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) provides a new approach for bird diversity assessment, and it is non-invasive, suitable for long-term monitoring and data can be stored permanently. To explore the effectiveness of PAM in assessing bird diversity in subtropical forests, this study conducted traditional line transect surveys and PAM across seven regions in Lishui, Zhejiang Province, from 2020 to 2023. Acoustic data were processed using a combination of manual and AI-assisted identification to obtain bird species composition and acoustic bird diversity indices (species richness R_SN, diversity index R_H, richness index R_R, evenness index R_J, bird index R_V), and six soundscape indices (acoustic complexity index ACI, bioacoustic index BI, acoustic entropy index H, normalized difference soundscape index NDSI, acoustic diversity index ADI, acoustic evenness indices AEI) were calculated. The results showed that: (1) A total of 177 bird species were recorded by the two methods combined, with species recorded by both methods accounting for 58.19%, and each method uniquely recorded 37 species, indicating that acoustic monitoring effectively supplements traditional surveys by detecting overlooked species; (2) The correlations between soundscape indices and acoustic bird diversity indices exhibited significant seasonal differences, with the strongest correlations in spring (15 significant pairs) and the weakest in summer (3 significant pairs), among which the BI performed most robustly on the overall scale; (3) The bird species richness and acoustic bird index calculated from acoustic data showed consistent ranking across the seven regions, effectively distinguishing bird diversity levels among different habitats. In conclusion, PAM can effectively obtain bird species composition information, and acoustic bird diversity indices show potential for biodiversity assessment, but the application of soundscape indices requires consideration of seasonal differences. This study provides scientific basis and practical reference for applying PAM in biodiversity monitoring and assessment in subtropical regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回