EBSAs的国家实践、挑战及对中国的启示

National-level Practices and Challenges of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): Lessons for China

  • 摘要: 海洋覆盖了地球表面的71%,是地球上生物多样性最丰富的生态系统之一,孕育着近220万种海洋生物。然而,随着全球人口的持续增长和经济活动的不断加剧,海洋生态系统正承受前所未有的压力与挑战。在《生物多样性公约》框架下提出了"具有重要生态或生物学意义的海洋区域"(EBSAs)的识别进程,旨在依据科学标准识别对生态系统结构与功能具有关键作用的区域,为全球海洋生物多样性保护与可持续利用提供决策支撑。本文系统梳理并总结了加拿大、澳大利亚、南非及欧盟在EBSAs识别与管理方面的实践及经验,分析其在科学评估、法律政策衔接及社会参与等方面的主要做法,为EBSAs识别及管理提供有益借鉴。然而,从全球进程来看,EBSAs仍面临数据与技术支撑不足、法律效力有限、区域协同机制不完善及经济活动与生态保护矛盾突出等共性问题。结合已有经验与中国海洋生物多样性保护管理实际,本文提出中国应从夯实科学研究与数据监测基础、健全法律法规与政策体系、统筹经济发展与生物多样性保护、促进利益相关方参与、保障资金投入及深化国际合作等方面着手,系统推进EBSAs识别与管理进程,为提升国家海洋生物多样性保护水平及深度参与全球海洋治理提供重要参考。

     

    Abstract: Covering 71% of the Earth's surface, the ocean is one of the most biodiverse ecosystems on the planet, harboring nearly 2.2 million marine species. However, with continuous global population growth and intensifying economic activities, marine ecosystems are facing unprecedented pressures and challenges. Under the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the identification of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) aims to scientifically pinpoint marine regions critical to ecosystem structure and function. This process provides essential decision-making support for global biodiversity conservation and the sustainable use of ocean resources. This study systematically reviews the management practices of Canada, Australia, South Africa, and the European Union regarding EBSAs. By analyzing their approaches to scientific assessment, policy integration, and stakeholder participation, the paper offers valuable insights for optimizing EBSAs governance. While these regions have developed multi-level frameworks combining scientific evaluation with legal instruments, legal and policy instruments, and public engagement, offering valuable lessons for future EBSAs governance. Nevertheless, at the global level, the EBSAs process continues to face common challenges, including data deficiencies and technical support, limited legal efficacy, fragmented regional coordination, and prominent conflicts between economic activities and ecological protection. Drawing upon international experience and China's marine governance context, this paper proposes that China should consolidate marine scientific research and data monitoring, improve legal and policy frameworks, coordinate economic development and biodiversity conservation, promote stakeholder participation, ensure securing sustainable funding, and deepening regional and international cooperation. These actions aim to systematically advance the EBSAs identification and management process, providing important references for enhancing marine biodiversity conservation, and solidifying China's active role.

     

/

返回文章
返回