行间生草对葡萄园土壤养分、酶活性及微生物群落的影响

Effects of Inter-row Grass on Soil Nutrient, Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community in Vineyard

  • 摘要: 通过评估行间生草对贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄园土壤养分与微生物群落结构的影响, 筛选出适宜贺兰山东麓的葡萄行间生草草种。本研究以"霞多丽"葡萄为试验材料, 在葡萄行间设置救荒野豌豆(Vicia sativa)、驴食草(Onobrychis viciifolia)、湖南稗子(Echinochloa frumentacea)和黑麦草(Lolium perenne)4个生草品种, 以传统清耕为对照, 研究葡萄园表层土壤特性、酶活性和微生物群落结构。结果表明: 与清耕对照相比, 生草处理降低了葡萄园土壤pH, 其中救荒野豌豆与湖南稗子处理pH降低幅度最大, 较清耕对照分别降低12.83%和13.40%;生草处理土壤有机质、全氮、全磷和速效磷含量明显提升, 其中救荒野豌豆处理的效果最好, 其土壤有机质、全氮、全磷和速效磷含量分别为9.15 g·kg-1、1.64 g·kg-1、19.30 g·kg-1和72.61 mg·kg-1。驴食草处理碱解氮含量最高, 为35.53 mg·kg-1。生草处理增加了土壤过氧化氢酶、脲酶、碱性磷酸酶、纤维素酶、蔗糖酶和淀粉酶活性。与清耕对照相比, 生草处理真菌和细菌OTU数目均升高, 土壤细菌群落香农(Shannon)指数、辛普森(Simpson)指数和Chao1指数均有所提升, 真菌群落无显著差异。细菌群落组成结果显示, 门水平下变形菌门(26.22%~32.98%)、拟杆菌门(11.78%~16.83%)和放线菌门(9.97%~17.29%)为优势菌门; 真菌门水平下子囊菌门(57.18%~85.11%)为优势菌门。冗余分析表明, 土壤环境因子中淀粉酶活性对细菌群落结构影响显著, 碱解氮含量对真菌群落结构影响显著。主成分分析结果表明, 清耕对照以及救荒野豌豆、驴食草、湖南稗子和黑麦草处理综合得分分别为-2.268、1.954、1.450、-0.207和-0.934, 由此可知救荒野豌豆处理效果最好。综上所述, 贺兰山东麓葡萄园行间生草对土壤理化性质和酶活性具有一定改善作用, 并且生草增加了土壤中微生物数量, 并不同程度地改变了细菌与真菌群落结构与多样性, 其中种植救荒野豌豆和驴食草对土壤的影响较优。

     

    Abstract: This study investigated the effects of inter-row grass cropping on soil nutrients and microbial community structure in wine grape vineyards in the eastern foothills of the Helan Mountains, aiming to identify suitable cover crop species for the region. Using Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Chardonnay" as the test material, four cover crop species-Vicia sativa, Onobrychis viciifolia, Echinochloa frumentacea, and Lolium perenne -were planted between vine rows, with traditional clean tillage as the control. The surface soil properties, enzyme activities, and microbial community structure were analyzed. The results showed that compared with clean tillage, the inter-row grass cropping reduced the soil pH value of the vineyard, and the reduction range of Vicia sativa and Echinochloa frumentacea was the largest, with 12.83% and 13.40%, respectively. The contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and available phosphorus were significantly increased in the inter-row grass cropping, and the best effects of Vicia sativa treatment were 9.15 g·kg-1, 1.64 g·kg-1, 19.30 g·kg-1 and 72.61 mg·kg-1, respectively. The soil alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN) content of Onobrychis viciifolia treatment was the highest, which was 35.53 mg·kg-1. Additionally, cover cropping enhanced the activities of soil enzymes, including catalase, urease, alkaline phosphatase, cellulase, sucrase, and amylase. Compared with clean tillage, the inter-row grass cropping increased the number of fungal and bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indices of bacterial communities were elevated, while fungal community diversity showed no significant differences. The results of bacterial community composition showed that Proteobacteria (26.22%-32.98%), Bacteroidota (11.78%-16.83%) and Actinobacteriota (9.97%-17.29%) were the dominant phyla at the phylum level. Ascomycota (57.18%-85.11%) was the dominant phyla among fungi. Redundancy analysis indicated that amylase activity significantly influenced bacterial community structure, while AN content was the key factor affecting fungal communities. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the comprehensive scores of clean tillage, Vicia sativa, Onobrychis viciifolia, Echinochloa frumentacea and Lolium perenne were -2.268, 1.954, 1.455, -0.207 and -0.934, respectively, indicating that the best treatment effect is Vicia sativa. In conclusion, in the vineyards at the eastern foot of the Helan Mountains, inter-row grass cropping has certain improvement effects on soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities, increased the number of microorganisms in the soil, and changed the community structure and diversity of bacteria and fungi to varying degrees, among which the planting of Vicia sativa and Onobrychis viciifolia have a better effects on soil.

     

/

返回文章
返回