处理时间和物料类型对强还原消减土壤生物复合污染的影响研究

Effects of Treatment Duration and Material Type on the Reduction of Soil Biological Co-contamination through Reductive Soil Disinfestation

  • 摘要: 为探究强还原处理(reductive soil disinfestation,RSD)时间和物料类型对土传病原菌和抗生素抗性基因(antibiotic resistance genes,ARGs)叠加形成的生物复合污染的影响,以生物复合污染严重的农田土壤为研究对象,设置不同时间(10、20和30 d)、不同物料类型〔苜蓿粉(AL)、糖蜜(MO)、复合碳源(mALmMO=1∶1,AM)〕的RSD,同时设置不处理对照(CK),利用荧光定量PCR技术分析不同RSD后土壤中青枯菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)、ARGs和可移动遗传元件(mobile genetic elements,MGEs)相对丰度及其消减率的变化。结果发现:RSD(AL和AM)对土壤中的青枯菌具有显著消减作用,随着RSD时间的延长,青枯菌的消减率逐渐下降并趋于稳定;RSD时间对土壤中不同ARGs和MGEs的影响存在差异,延长RSD时间可有效提高土壤中aadA21blaCARBIS6100基因的消减率,30 d时各基因最高消减率分别为49.9%、58.7%和43.9%;土壤中APH(3″)-Iatet36基因的消减率随RSD时间延长呈先升后降的趋势,在20 d时最高消减率分别为70.7%和74.1%;土壤中tetGmsrEsul1基因的消减率随着RSD时间的延长,呈明显的先降后升趋势。不同物料类型的RSD对消减土壤生物复合污染具有不同的效果,AL对青枯菌、aadA21tet36qacH基因具有更好的消减效果,AM则在消减aadA7tetGIS6100基因时更具优势。修复由土传病原菌、ARGs和MGEs叠加形成的生物复合污染土壤时,应有针对性地选择RSD时间和物料类型,方能达到最佳的修复效果。

     

    Abstract: To investigate the effects of treatment duration and material type in reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) on soil biological co-contamination caused by the combined presence of soil-borne pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), farmland soils with severe biological co-contamination were selected as the research subjects. RSD treatments were applied using three durations (10, 20, and 30 d) and three material types: alfalfa (AL), molasses (MO), and a mixture of alfalfa and molasses (mALmMO=1∶1, AM), and an untreated control (CK) was also included. Each treatment was conducted for all three durations (10, 20, and 30 d). Changes in the relative abundances and reduction rates of Ralstonia solanacearum, ARGs, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) under different RSDs were analyzed via real-time PCR. The results show that RSD (AL and AM) had a significant inhibitory effect on the relative abundance of R. solanacearum. As RSD duration increased, the reduction rate of R. solanacearum gradually declined and then stabilized. The effects of RSD duration on different ARGs and MGEs in the soils varied. Extending the RSD duration effectively enhanced the reduction of aadA21, blaCARB and IS6100 genes with the highest reduction rates at 30 d being 49.9%, 58.7%, and 43.9%, respectively. In contrast, the reduction rates of APH(3″)-Ia and tet36 initially increased and then decreased over time, reaching their highest values at 20 d (70.7% and 74.1%), respectively. The reduction rates of the tetG, msrE, and sul1 genes in the soil exhibited a distinct trend of initially decreasing and then increasing with prolonged RSD duration. The RSDs with different material types showed varying effects on reducing soil biological co-contamination. AL was more effective in reducing the relative abundance of R. solanacearum, aadA21, tet36, and qacH genes, whereas AM was more effective in reducing the relative abundance of aadA7, tetG, and IS6100 genes. For the remediation of soil biological co-contamination caused by the combined presence of soil-borne pathogens, ARGs, and MGEs, it is essential to select both the RSD duration and material type strategically in a targeted way to achieve optimal results.

     

/

返回文章
返回