松散堆积体边坡植被分布特征及其环境因子解析

    Analysis of Vegetation Distribution Characteristics and Environmental Factors of Loose Accumulation Slope

    • 摘要: 松散堆积体边坡植被恢复过程复杂, 微地形、植被分布和土壤特征是影响植被恢复的关键因素, 该研究旨在进一步阐明各因素对植被分布的影响, 为松散堆积体边坡的生态恢复提供科学依据。以黄院采石场松散堆积体边坡为对象, 开展自然恢复边坡植被调查及土壤样品采集, 采用统计检验、Pearson相关性分析等方法研究植被分布特征及其环境因子。结果表明: (1)松散堆积体边坡植被斑块数量多、景观形状指数大, 其中阴坡和半阴半阳坡具有较大的斑块面积和最大斑块指数, 最大值分别为22.37 m2和11.57%, 说明植被分布相对分散, 生长受环境的空间异质性影响。与阳坡相比, 阴坡和半阴半阳坡更利于植物聚集生长。(2)植被多样性在不同坡向间差异显著, 阳坡的Simpson优势度指数(C)显著大于阴坡和半阴半阳坡(P < 0.01), 而Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H)、Margalef丰富度指数(D)和Pielou均匀度指数(E)表现出相反的规律, 说明阳坡植被群落尚不稳定, 优势种地位突出, 而阴坡和半阴半阳坡的植被丰富度指数高且分布更为均匀。(3)松散堆积体的土壤相对贫瘠, 土壤有机质和全氮含量属于"极缺", 土壤有效磷含量等级为"很缺", 若不开展人为辅助工程, 植被难以自然恢复。表层覆土对土壤物理性质的影响较大, 土壤孔隙度均值为29.92%, 其物理结构特性由原本不持水的大孔隙转变为通气性较差的小孔隙。(4)土壤含水量和有效磷含量是影响松散堆积体植被多样性的主要土壤理化因子, 而坡向是影响植被变化的主要地形因子。综上可知, 通过微地形的调整营造适宜植物生长的微生境, 对松散堆积体边坡植被生长具有重要作用, 土壤含水量仍是植被恢复的关键因子, 在地形营造过程中应优先考虑。

       

      Abstract: The process of vegetation restoration on loose deposit slopes is complex and challenging. Micro-topography, vegetation distribution, and soil characteristics are key factors influencing vegetation restoration. This study aims to further elucidate the effects of these factors on vegetation distribution and provide a scientific basis for the ecological restoration of loose deposit slopes. The loose deposit slopes of Huangyuan quarry were selected as the study area, and a vegetation survey and soil sample collection were conducted on naturally restored slopes. Statistical tests and Pearson correlation analysis were used to investigate the distribution characteristics of vegetation and interpret the environmental factors influencing its distribution. The results of the study show: (1) The loose deposit slopes exhibited a large number of vegetation patches and a high landscape shape index, while the shady and semi-shady slopes had relatively large patch area and the maximum patch index, with the largest patch area as 22.37 m2 and the highest patch index as 11.57%. These results suggest that vegetation distribution was relatively fragmented and its growth was significantly influenced by the spatial heterogeneity of the environment. Compared to sunny slopes, shady and semi-shady slopes were more favorable for plant aggregation and growth. (2) Vegetation diversity differed significantly across slope aspects. The Simpson dominance index (C) was significantly higher on sunny slopes than on shady and semi-shady slopes (P < 0.01), whereas the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H), Margalef richness index (D), and Pielou evenness index (E) showed the opposite trend. This indicates that the vegetation community on sunny slopes was still unstable, with a dominance of a few species, while the vegetation on shady and semi-shady slopes exhibited higher richness and more even distribution. (3) Loose deposit soils were relatively poor, with extremely low levels of organic matter and total nitrogen content, and very deficient levels of available phosphorus. Without artificial intervention, natural vegetation recovery is unlikely. The physical properties of the soil were significantly affected by surface soil cover. The average soil porosity was 29.92%, and the physical structure of the soil changed from large pores with poor water retention to small pores with poor air permeability. (4) Soil moisture and available phosphorus content were the primary physicochemical factors influencing vegetation diversity on loose deposits, while slope aspect was the main topographic factor driving vegetation change. It is crucial to create microhabitats suitable for plant growth through micro-topographic adjustments to promote vegetation growth on loose deposit slopes. Soil moisture content is the key factor for vegetation restoration and should be prioritized during terrain remodeling.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回